Den of Thieves
Gerard Butler is the man.
But there’s a good reason I
Never see his flicks.
I could go on and on about how much I love MoviePass. I’ve only been a subscriber since the end of December, but I’ve already seen 11 movies with it. “Den of Thieves” is the first movie I saw using the service that I otherwise wouldn’t have seen, and let’s just say there’s a reason I wouldn’t have seen it otherwise. I’m not exactly sure what they were going for here, but the result was something like a “Fast and Furious: Bank Robbery Edition” wannabe – just switch out rapper Ludacris for 50 Cent, Pablo Who Cares for Vin Diesel, Gerard Butler for The Rock and boom, you have your knockoff.
But okay, let me backtrack. This January release honestly wasn’t that bad. O’Shea Jackson Jr. is proving to be the guy who elevates a movie with just his presence alone, and although Butler was one of my main draws to the movie, he was one of the movie’s weakest links. His performance seemed more contrived than genuine, but that might have just been the way his character was written. I actually love Gerard Butler, but I always forget about him because I never see any of his movies. “Geostorm” what? “London Has Fallen” who? At this point, I’m not sure if he’s a decent actor who picks terrible roles or if he’s a B-list actor who’s stumbled into a few great ones.
Overall, “Den of Thieves” was solid entertainment. It moved along at a decent pace and didn’t overstay its welcome. It’s no “Hell or High Water” or “Inside Man,” but no movie with 50 Cent is supposed to be. Maybe I’m the only one who didn’t see the twist coming, and while I thought it was a good one, I can’t shake off the feeling that the reason I didn’t see it coming is because there weren’t enough clues to deduce it. But that’s just my external locus of control talking.